92 lines
		
	
	
		
			3.1 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Markdown
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			92 lines
		
	
	
		
			3.1 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Markdown
		
	
	
	
	
	
| # Technical Committee
 | |
| 
 | |
| _This document only makes sense with the rules from [the community document](community)_.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The Technical Committee (**TC**) is here to arbitrate and make decisions when
 | |
| technical conflicts occur in the project.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The TC main role is to resolve technical conflicts.
 | |
| It is therefore not a technical steering committee, but it is understood that
 | |
| some decisions might impact the future of the project.
 | |
| 
 | |
| # Process
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Seizing
 | |
| 
 | |
| The TC can take possession of any technical matter that it sees fit.
 | |
| 
 | |
| To involve the TC in a matter, email tc@ or CC them on an ongoing discussion.
 | |
| 
 | |
| As members of TC are developers, they also can email tc@ to raise an issue.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Announcement
 | |
| 
 | |
| The TC, once seized, must announce itself on the main mailing list, with a _[TC]_ tag.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The TC has 2 modes of operation: a RFC one and an internal one.
 | |
| 
 | |
| If the TC thinks it needs the input from the larger community, the TC can call
 | |
| for a RFC. Else, it can decide by itself.
 | |
| 
 | |
| If the disagreement involves a member of the TC, that member should recuse
 | |
| themselves from the decision.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The decision to use a RFC process or an internal discussion is a discretionary
 | |
| decision of the TC.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The TC can also reject a seizure for a few reasons such as:
 | |
| the matter was not discussed enough previously; it lacks expertise to reach a
 | |
| beneficial decision on the matter; or the matter is too trivial.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ### RFC call
 | |
| 
 | |
| In the RFC mode, one person from the TC posts on the mailing list the
 | |
| technical question and will request input from the community.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The mail will have the following specification:
 | |
| * a precise title
 | |
| * a specific tag [TC RFC]
 | |
| * a top-level email
 | |
| * contain a precise question that does not exceed 100 words and that is answerable by developers
 | |
| * may have an extra description, or a link to a previous discussion, if deemed necessary,
 | |
| * contain a precise end date for the answers.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The answers from the community must be on the main mailing list and must have
 | |
| the following specification:
 | |
| * keep the tag and the title unchanged
 | |
| * limited to 400 words
 | |
| * a first-level, answering directly to the main email
 | |
| * answering to the question.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Further replies to answers are permitted, as long as they conform to the
 | |
| community standards of politeness, they are limited to 100 words, and are not
 | |
| nested more than once. (max-depth=2)
 | |
| 
 | |
| After the end-date, mails on the thread will be ignored.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Violations of those rules will be escalated through the Community Committee.
 | |
| 
 | |
| After all the emails are in, the TC has 96 hours to give its final decision.
 | |
| Exceptionally, the TC can request an extra delay, that will be notified on the
 | |
| mailing list.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ### Within TC
 | |
| 
 | |
| In the internal case, the TC has 96 hours to give its final decision.
 | |
| Exceptionally, the TC can request an extra delay.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Decisions
 | |
| 
 | |
| The decisions from the TC will be sent on the mailing list, with the _[TC]_ tag.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Internally, the TC should take decisions with a majority, or using
 | |
| ranked-choice voting.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The decision from the TC should be published with a summary of the reasons that
 | |
| lead to this decision.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The decisions from the TC are final, until the matters are reopened after
 | |
| no less than one year.
 | |
| 
 |